Search for: "Clark v. State of Md" Results 21 - 40 of 101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2017, 12:58 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 62589 (MD TN, April 25, 2017), a Tennessee federal district court permitted a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his complaint that he was not delivered his package that contained a prayer rug, prayer cap, Quran and prayer oil.In State Department of Corrections v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Netter, MD, School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, How and Why to Bring Business Students Into the Health Law World? [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 7:41 am by Liah Caravalho
As part of the Law Library’s ongoing commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:19 am by D. Daxton White
According to the SEC website, the following are xamples of SEC enforcement actions against Ponzi schemes: 2014 ·         Neal V. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
” That’s how the Maryland Court of Appeals — that state’s highest court — in Bontempo v Lares, 444 Md. 344 [2015], recently referred to the remedy of judicial dissolution made available by statute in most states, including New York, to oppressed minority shareholders of closely held corporations. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[19] Other unusual vehicles for causing E. coli O157:H7 infections have included apple juice, yogurt, dried salami, and mayonnaise.[20] According to a recent study, an “estimated 73,480 illnesses due to E. coli O157:H7 infections occur each year in the United States, leading to an estimated 2,168 hospitalizations and sixty-one deaths annually. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
The discovery obligations with respect to statistician expert witnesses vary considerably among state and federal courts. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:48 am by Schachtman
., MDL No. 2342; 12-md-2342, 2014 U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]