Search for: "Clinton v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2020, 11:59 am
The Clinton administration eventually ratified the treaty on behalf of the United States in 1993, after receiving the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
” The “objective partisan assumption” is that lawyers can make independent ethical evaluations of client behaviour, while also remaining loyal to clients partisan Cognitive biases toward optimism, confirmation of existing beliefs make it much more difficult for lawyers to neutrally assess the behaviour of their own clients The perjury trilemma: lawyers have duties to (1) be competent, (2) preserve client confidences, and (3) be honest in court. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
His trial offers the possibility of fresh insights into the strange quest by some in Trump’s orbit for a kind of political kryptonite to use against Hillary Clinton – secret emails that would, they hoped, destroy her candidacy. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:34 am
Related Cases: Lexmark v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm
(The first was by President Clinton.) [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
The court in the 1936 case United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:00 pm
Franks v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:30 am
Even if the affidavit been "corrected" by including the omitted information "nothing in the outcome of the Superior Court proceedings that would have negated probable cause. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 1:34 pm
Wash. 16-cv-01886) voluntarily dismissed; state administrative appeal to Thurston County Superior Court, Docket No. 17-2-02446-34; Guerra v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:00 pm
See, e.g., Zivotofsky v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
I also noted that the Supreme Court has never accepted the “citizen uprising theory” of the Second Amendment. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:53 am
A D.C. federal district court judge ruled yesterday in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:05 am
They had come to a rueful admiration of Justice Scalia’s lone dissent from the Supreme Court’s decision, Morrison v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
Clinton’s dealings with Madison Guaranty and also from the recent impeachment investigation of Alabama Governor Robert Bentley. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:30 am
As explained by the district court in Nader v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 1:01 am
Supreme Court in Korematsu v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:52 am
Perhaps he ought to take another look at Clinton v. [read post]
