Search for: "Collins v. Held" Results 21 - 40 of 1,261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm by INFORRM
The Court also held that Mr Justice Nicklin did not fall into error by refusing to define the word “racist”. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 22 and 23 January 2024, Collins Rice J heard the trial of Nagi v Sinniah Santhiramoulesan QB-2021-002658. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
Mr Justice Nicklin said there was a “real prospect” the publisher could succeed in showing “an honest person could have held the opinion that [Harry] was responsible for attempting to mislead and confuse the public as to the true position (and that this was ironic given that he now held a public role in tackling ‘misinformation’)”. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The court held that the claim was “scandalous, frivolous and vexatious. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
The court held that the imputation was defamatory and that no defences applied. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, observed the Appellate Division, "plaintiffs in retaliation cases are held to a lenient pleading standard and are generally afforded deference at the pleading stage, citing Thomas v Mintz, 182 AD3d 490 and Petit v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 177 AD3d 402. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, observed the Appellate Division, "plaintiffs in retaliation cases are held to a lenient pleading standard and are generally afforded deference at the pleading stage, citing Thomas v Mintz, 182 AD3d 490 and Petit v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 177 AD3d 402. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
§ 794(a)], sue his employer for its alleged failure to accommodate his sleeping disorder [see Collins v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:25 am by Peter J. Sluka
  In some cases, Courts enforce the stale Schedule A as written: In Estate of Connie Collins v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 14 December 2023 there was a set aside application in the case of McGee v Lewis before Collins Rice J. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
A defectively noticed meeting can cause corporate chaos: any resulting corporate action runs the heavy risk of being deemed “null and void” (Collins v Telcoa Intl. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
QC is dedicated to the notion that all news media should be held accountable. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts Between 27 November and 1 December 2023, Collins Rice J continued to hear the trial in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am by centerforartlaw
But it now appears the artist’s long-held secret may be in jeopardy: Banksy has recently been involved in a number of legal battles with a greeting card company over a trademark dispute and now a libel lawsuit. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am by Frank Cranmer
Wearing religious symbols and the CJEU To the surprise of some (though not to us because we’d read the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Collins) on Tuesday, in OP v Commune d’Ans [2023] EUECJ C‑148/22 the CJEU held that the ban on municipal employees wearing signs or dress indicating their religious or philosophical beliefs imposed by the Commune d’Ans, in Belgium, was not incompatible with their rights under the EU Charter: we noted… [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of McGee v Lewis KB-2023-002435. [read post]