Search for: "Colone v. Texas"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Sys., 573 F.3d 233, 236 (5th Cir.2009) (holding that Texas law requires a doubling of the relative risk of an [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 1:15 pm
Brackeen v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:09 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
Texas, 128 S.Ct. 1346 (2008). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:36 pm
Kastenberg, The Limits of Executive Power in Crisis in the Early Republic: Martin v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:58 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:58 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 4:27 am
State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:47 pm
" Texas v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 8:38 am
Texas --Notes and Questions --A Note on Medellin --Kiobel v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Calero-Colon v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Calero-Colon v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
The result had been the psychological ‘colonization’ of Mexican American youth. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
The result had been the psychological ‘colonization’ of Mexican American youth. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:29 am
Newman v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Wheelahan v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 1:19 am
Visit the Career Center Attorneys Angry Over Their Inclusion on List of Criminally Charged Texas Lawyer A Texas television station that regularly publishes online the names of persons charged with misdemeanor offenses erroneously included the names of about 25 attorneys on the list that appeared on its Web site on March 16. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Colon, No. 07-3929 Conviction for possession with intent to sell cocaine and conspiracy is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and sentence vacated and remanded where: 1) the seizure of defendant was based on reasonable suspicion; but 2) defendant's routine buyer-seller relationship with the participants in a drug conspiracy did not by itself make him a co-conspirator or an aider and abettor of the conspiracy. [read post]
