Search for: "Commander v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 5,567
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2024, 10:23 am by David Luban
Under the ICC’s founding principle of complementarity, a case is “inadmissible” if it is being “investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution” (Rome Statute art. 17(1)(a)). [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
Warrants would also provide the focal point for political and legal mobilization in third states, including the United States, making it harder to sustain military aid to Israel. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Though often hailed as an originalist triumph, Dobbs v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
In subsequent cases relating to Indian Affairs legislation, the Court should clarify that only a very narrow version of the anticommandeering doctrine applies in this context because of the virtual absence of state authority in the area and the history of acceptance of federal activities that can be described as commandeering state enforcement activities. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In subsequent cases relating to Indian Affairs legislation, the Court should clarify that only a very narrow version of the anticommandeering doctrine applies in this context because of the virtual absence of state authority in the area and the history of acceptance of federal activities that can be described as commandeering state enforcement activities. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am by Mutasim Ali
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:35 am by timothy-abeel
The 7.3 is a V8, which means it has eight cylinders in a V formation — the most common layout for eight-cylinder engines. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Will Baude
I've benefited from much thoughtful commentary about last week's arguments in Trump v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm by Marty Lederman
 Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]