Search for: "Commonwealth v. Cooper, D."
Results 21 - 40
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2010, 2:10 pm
In the Comment/Response Document, the Department also notes that Section 102.14(d)(2(v) provides a waiver for brownfield redevelopment projects from the new riparian buffer requirements. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:00 am
On Thursday 9 June it will hear the compliance cost issues in the cases of Price Waterhouse Coopers v Saad Investments Company Ltd & Anor (Bermuda) and Singularis Holdings Ltd v Price Waterhouse Coopers (Bermuda). [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Platt of counsel), for amicus curiae United States of America.Barbara D. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Driehaus, 814 F.3d 466 (6th Cir. 2016); Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
" 13A WRIGHT, MILLER, AND COOPER, FED. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
There is a long history of this association in the Commonwealth and the United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:58 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 5:30 am
In Dillon v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Supp.2d 863, 876 (D. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 4:44 am
appeared first on Russell D. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Green, D. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:53 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:32 am
A contract violating Section 4 78 is illegal “and under our settled rules [New York courts] refuse to aid in it but leave the parties where they are” (Spivak, 16 NY2d at 168, citing McConnell v Commonwealth Pictures Corp., 7 NY2d 465 [1960]; see also El Gamayel v Seaman, 72 NY2d 701, 705 [1988] [“As a matter of public policy, a contract to provide services in violation of [Judiciary Law§ 478] is unenforceable in our state… [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:55 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:55 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
Commonwealth Ins. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
" Restatement (Second) of Torts §286, comment d (1965), see Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §4, comment d (1997) ("purpose" is to be taken "into account in determining whether noncompliance. . .renders the product defective"). [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Creedon and D. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
British American Tobacco defeats trade mark challenge in the Commonwealth Caribbean: Philip Morris Products S.A. v British American Tobacco (Brands) Limited (jiplp) Brazil Can we feed the hungry on statistics? [read post]
