Search for: "Commonwealth v. PHILIP S." Results 21 - 40 of 67
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am by John Elwood
Philip Randoph Institute, 16-980, and Patchak v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 4:47 pm by Stephen Page
  I am merely determining the question of whether the husband’s mother should be joined as a party to the proceedings. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Common Thread Network is is a forum for data protection and privacy authorities of Commonwealth countries, established in 2014. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:37 am
 Because the Regulation merely limited the "use" of trade marks they did not strip away the trade mark owner;s right to prevent or exclude others from using their mark (citing Arnold J in Pinterest v Premium Interest). [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 11:36 pm
 In October 2012, a majority of the High Court ruled that even though the Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011 (Cth) restricted the intellectual property rights of the tobacco companies and regulated the packaging and presentation of tobacco products, the legislation was not an “acquisition” under section 51(xxxi) of the Australian Constitution, as there was no proprietary benefit or advantage conferred on the Commonwealth of Australia (JT International SA v… [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Dr Rolph’s account of the tortuous process by which uniform defamation law was achieved in 2005 leads us closer to an understanding of the problem, by explaining that, until Commonwealth Attorney-General Philip Ruddock threatened to draft Commonwealth legislation based on the communications and corporations power, defamation law reform was rarely seen by state politicians as having any sort of priority. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
John’s Anglican Church in Petaluma, CA; Episcopal Diocese of Northern California v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
A number of well respected academics doing excellent work in the field were asked to comment around Professor's Ruggie's remarks. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
And while the Navy’s understanding of its own catastrophic neglect of safety in its shipyards came before Selikoff’s publications, the Navy’s coyness kept its information from being widely disseminated. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
This anxiety about a representative – or reflective – judiciary was captured most vividly in the Supreme Court’s decision in R.D.S. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
John’s Anglican Church in Petaluma, CA ; Episcopal Diocese of Northern California v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
This search has given birth to many myths about the goals and purposes of Congress’s copyright power. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am by Rob Robinson
" - http://bit.ly/OD2EHe (Philip Elmer-Dewitt) Judge Slams Samsung Lawyers - WSJ.com - http://on.wsj.com/M9RRV0 (Ian Sherr) Samsung's Big Zinger in Patent Case: Apple Exec Liked 7-Inch Galaxy - http://bit.ly/QqPEVG (Christina DesMarais) Apple's Schiller Testifies in Smartphone Patent Trial - http://nyti.ms/MnZ6dh (Nick Bilton) Samsung Says Apple's Claim is an Affront to the Integrity of the Jury |… [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Sometimes courts are extremely reluctant to accept that defendant’s use is use as a mark: Koninklijke Philips Electronics v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by Wessen Jazrawi
APPGER and extraordinary rendition  Panopticon has blogged on the First Tier Tribunal’s decision on the set of requests made by the All Party Parliamentary Group on Extraordinary Rendition (“APPGER”) to the Foreign & Commonwealth Office: APPGER v Information Commissioner and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office EA/2011/0049-0051. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:00 pm by Matthew Bush
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionReply of petitioner Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
On 14 March 2012, Tugendhat J handed down judgment in Citation PLC v Ellis Whittam Ltd, ([2012] EWHC 549 (QB)) On 15 March 2012 Tugendhat J gave judgment in Weston v Bates ([2012] EWHC 590 (QB)) Events 19 March 2012, 6pm: The Data Protection Act 1998 and Personal Privacy, Philip Coppel QC, Organised by the Statute Law Society with the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies. [read post]