Search for: "Commonwealth v. Poole, S." Results 21 - 40 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2015, 4:25 am by David DePaolo
That's the rule the courts are supposed to respect: courts interpret the law, legislatures make the law.According to WorkCompCentral reporter Steve Sadin in his report yesterday, though, the Kentucky League of Cities, which operates a workers’ compensation risk pool for the commonwealths municipalities, has been advising its members not to return claimants to light-duty work while they are recovering. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:17 am by Eugene Volokh
Tort law often gives you some rather odd fact patterns; here's one I just came across, from Woods-Leber v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:13 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
While a duty of care can be created by statute (anyone with a driver’s license in a car crash case) or it can be created by a contractual relationship (a lifeguard with respect to a pool accident), not everyone has a duty of care to protect everyone else. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:11 pm by Brian Shiffrin
For a defendant's constitutional rights to be meaningful, the exclusionary rule must apply (see generally People v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 10:47 am by Ilya Somin
A more telling precedent is the Supreme Court’s 1905 decision in Jacobson v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
Opinion below (3rd Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al. [read post]