Search for: "Consolidated Truck Service v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
" You have to question the judgment of those who would have any truck whatsoever with such nonsense, and who would jeopardize the reputation of the Georgia Senate to lend aid and comfort to such radical causes and fringe groups. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:58 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Meanwhile, a new poll finds that Americans’ perceptions of the United States’ fight against the Islamic State are becoming more positive. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 12:54 am
A subscription to LAW.COM is needed for online access to this service. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
Petitioner Bostock worked for the Clayton County Juvenile Court System as a child welfare services coordinator. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
In that case, the Court rejected a lawsuit by the United States seeking to recoup the cost of hospitalizing a soldier tortiously injured in an auto wreck involving one of the defendant's trucks. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm by Matt Murphy
The United States Department of Transportation estimates that human error accounted for 94% of these crashes. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360)   Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango)   Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am by Joy Waltemath
FMCSA considering loosening hours-of-service restrictions for commercial truck drivers. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm by Edith Roberts
In 2017, in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
Supreme Court held that an auto dealership’s service advisors are exempt under FLSA, Section 213(b)(10)(A), which applies to “any salesman, partsman, or mechanic primarily engaged in selling or servicing automobiles, trucks, or farm implements. [read post]
A property owner sought a demolition permit (for an existing dilapidated home) and design approval for an eight-unit multi-family building. [read post]
Both Sierra Club and Golden Door Properties, LLC, filed a petition for writ of mandate and an injunction, and the cases were consolidated. [read post]