Search for: "Corr v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
Officers & Police Benevolent Assn., Inc. v New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:35 am
Per Reeves v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
* Further, in Matter of Froehlich v New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
* Further, in Matter of Froehlich v New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Corr. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Corr. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:03 am
Dep't of Corr. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONMatter of County of Nassau v Nassau County Sheriff's Corr. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 6:44 am
New York State Dep't of Corr. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 8:31 am
Ritchie v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 8:54 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:45 am
Caldwell Corr. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:03 pm
In Glossip v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In any event, the TPVA established that it possessed no such materials (see Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York City Dept. of Corr., 200 AD3d 1038, 1039-1040). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In any event, the TPVA established that it possessed no such materials (see Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York City Dept. of Corr., 200 AD3d 1038, 1039-1040). [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 11:00 pm
”Given those discrepancies, the appellate court concluded that Corrections lacked a bonafide basis to withhold the requested footage and remitted the matter to the Albany County Supreme Court for a determination as to the fees and costs awardable to PLS, given its prevailing party status here.Looks like that FOIL foolishness got flogged.# # #Matter of Prisoners' Legal Servs. of N.Y. v New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
[New York State Corr. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
[New York State Corr. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:51 am
The first court decision discussing a delayed notice search warrant—that is to say, a covert search actually authorized in advance by a magistrate—is United States v. [read post]