Search for: "County of Los Angeles v. State of California (1987)"
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Selikoff arrived in Los Angeles, California, from Sydney, Australia, on the S.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:23 pm
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
Roberts, 59, of Los Angeles, has been appointed to a judgeship in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
County of Alameda, 411 U.S. 693, 717-719, 93 S.Ct. 1785, 36 L.Ed.2d 596 (1973) (holding that California counties are not arms of the state or alter egos of the state for purposes of diversity jurisdiction), overruled in part by Monell v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
City of Los Angeles (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 259, which focuses on whether an agency has discretion to require project changes that would mitigate environmental consequences an EIR might reveal. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
Today, the Supreme Court of California in Winn v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
The EIR related to general planning and conservation steps resulting from Los Angeles County’s prior approval of a 12,000 acre specific plan and neighboring 1500 acre conservation area in Ventura County. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
See Board of Airport Comm’rs of City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
City of Los Angeles (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 259, 272 — for the first time at oral argument; the quoted language explained that requiring EIRs for ministerial actions would be a wasteful gesture where the agency did not possess enough discretion to deny or modify the project based on environmental concerns raised by the EIR. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
City of Los Angeles (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 259, 272 — for the first time at oral argument; the quoted language explained that requiring EIRs for ministerial actions would be a wasteful gesture where the agency did not possess enough discretion to deny or modify the project based on environmental concerns raised by the EIR. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:21 am
In Los Angeles Cty. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
Libby, a deputy federal public defender in Los Angeles. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:26 pm
Los Angeles County, California, 482 U.S. 304, 318 (1987).Specifically, § 505 amends 49 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
California State Lands Commission)? [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. [read post]
