Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 21 - 40
of 14,548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
Supreme Court held that Securities and Exchange Commission administrative law judges (ALJs) are “officers of the United States,” subject to the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:54 pm
See Bell v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 10:00 am
Recent decisions by Administrative Law Judges of the NYC Office of Administrative Trials and HearingsHuman Resources Administration v Smart, OATH Index No. 1325/16NYC Dept. of Transportation v Harris, OATH Index No. 1531/16 Matter of Smart: In the Smart case, OATH Administrative Law Judge Kevin F. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:17 am
Designation of the hearing officer in an administrative disciplinary actionStein v Rockland Co., 259 AD2d 552William J. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 11:29 am
Supreme Court entered its opinion in the SEC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:50 am
Challenging administrative decisionsGomez v Safir, 271 AD2d 246The Gomez case points out a procedural trap that an individual may encounter in the event he or she delays challenging an administrative decision. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:46 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia vacated a DOL Administrative Interpretation issued in 2010 which declared that Mortgage Loan Officers are not exempt from the FLSA overtime requirements. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 11:36 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Perez v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 4:33 am
The appointing authority accepted the hearing officer’s findings and recommendation and dismissed Castillo.Castillo’s CPLR Article petition appealing his termination Supreme Court dismissed his petition on the grounds that he had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies.The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 9:03 pm
In Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 9:38 am
On August 20, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a district court’s dismissal of an appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) Patent Trial Background Appeal Board (PTAB) in Security People, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
A court’s review of an administrative hearing conducted pursuant to law is limited2014 NY Slip Op 00663, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Civil Service Law §75 disciplinary hearing officer found the employee against whom disciplinary charges and specifications had been filed [Petitioner] guilty of certain disciplinary charges and recommended that the employee be terminated from the position. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 11:04 am
New York Unified Court System, Office of Court Administration. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:51 am
In addition, the court stated, under the test articulated by the Supreme Court in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 11:40 am
This past Thursday the Maryland Court of Appeals held oral argument in Motor Vehicle Administration v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Supreme Court, concluding that the Commissioner exceeded his authority under the City Charter by suspending Officer indefinitely without pay, granted Officer’s petition to the extent of limiting the period of suspension without pay to 30 days, restoring Officer’s salary pending a final determination of any administrative disciplinary charges, and awarding Officer back pay from March 15, 2013.Citing Coscette v Town of… [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:22 pm
Patent and Trademark Office, perhaps the least likely administrative agency to receive Supreme Court deference). [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:28 am
However, shortly before the trial court was set to rule on the writ petition, the Court of Appeal decided Brown v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm
The recent decision of Justice Fuerst in R v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:25 am
In Lucia v. [read post]
