Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 21 - 40
of 4,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:15 am
(d) In accordance with the Supreme Court decisions in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:10 am
Goldstein v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
This included proceeds from the D&O policies held by C&A and by Heartland, the private equity fund that had acquired C&A. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:30 am
(d/b/a Di Da New York), No. 13 C 7165, Slip Op. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 9:15 pm
Then, the burden shifts to the taxpayer to prove otherwise. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 12:59 pm
Burgess v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:22 pm
Movies: want access to info they wouldn’t otherwise have. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 4:00 pm
Section 15(c) pertains to selling or otherwise profiting from collected biometric information. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 8:53 am
” The Third Circuit concluded that 924(j) extends the penalty regime “imposed under” subsection (c), incorporating the consecutive sentence mandate in 924(c)(1)(D)(ii), which is the “veritable raison d’etre” of the statutory scheme. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 1:46 pm
The judgment of the Supreme Court on 10th July in CEC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:11 am
At sentencing, the primary issue that Vucko raised was whether her wire fraud and tax fraud counts had to be grouped under the provisions of § 3D1.2(c) or (d). . . . [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 12:54 pm
Supp. 2d 119, 127 (D.D.C. 2010), aff’d sub nom Chaman v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:57 pm
We hold otherwise. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:58 pm
Text trail … E-v-i-d-e-n-c-e. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:08 am
V. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
Here's a very rough draft (not yet cite-checked and proofread), which you can also read in PDF; I'd love to hear people's view on it. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 12:55 pm
The case concerns an SPC based on a second medical use/formulation patent and stems from a referral to the CJEU made by the Paris Court of Appeal with decision of 9 October 2018 in Santen v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 4:50 pm
Editor’s note: This post is shared with minor edits from the Perkins Coie website here: https://www.perkinscoie.com/en/news-insights/d-c-circuit-overturns-fws-approval-of-wind-farm-due-to-bat.html# The U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 10:02 am
In particular, Section 619(c)(2) ensures that the new investment restrictions under Section 619(d)(1)(G)(iii) and Section 619(d)(4), including the numerical limitations under section 619(d)(4)(B)(ii), will only apply to a banking entity at the end of the period that is 2 years after the section’s effective date. [read post]
