Search for: "DAVID HECKLER" Results 21 - 40 of 75
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am by Eugene Volokh
[A forthcoming article of mine in the New York University Journal of Law & Liberty.] [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 8:03 am by Eugene Volokh
" Fourth Circuit case law makes clear that permitting a heckler's veto is a content-based restriction on speech. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:08 pm by Cary Coglianese
” Even when exemption authorizations are not explicit, another Supreme Court decision, in a 1985 case called Heckler v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:21 am by David Greene
EFF Civil Liberties Director David Greene delivered the following as a keynote address on March 6, 2020, at the Media Law and Policy in the Digital Age: Global Challenges and Opportunities symposium hosted by Indiana University's Center for International Media Law and Policy Studies and its Barbara Restle Press Law Project. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:28 am by Evelyn Douek
As Kaye says, in a comment seemingly aimed at those concerned that international human rights law will be insufficiently protective of free speech, “[T]here is no ‘heckler’s veto’ in international human rights law. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Or imposing on the inviting student group some or all of the security costs or the costs of procuring insurance policies to spread financial risks.Case Law and the Heckler’s VetoSupreme Court and lower court case law is extremely underdeveloped here—but decisions lean decidedly against any meaningful attendee limits or cost-sharing imposed on event organizers. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
And all nine justices seemed to agree that it would be impermissible to require a speaker to pay for security costs that arose because opponents to the speaker might show up and cause trouble; that would, said the justices, confer a “heckler’s veto” that would be inconsistent with the First Amendment’s core idea that unpopular speakers should not be shut down simply because they are in the minority (for the moment).The Court’s sentiments are quite… [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 4:41 am
Katfriend David Barron dwelt upon the issue in light of the judgement TQ Delta v Zyxel [2017] EWHC 3305 (Pat) in Trial sequence in SEP litigation - time for a rejig? [read post]
First, although we do recognize a First Amendment right to express discontent with what a speaker is saying, when jeering and heckling occurs not just in between the speaker’s utterances, but during each of them, they seem to us different in kind from speech to merely express the heckler’s contrarian point of view, and cross over into interference with, indeed the silencing of, another speaker’s expression. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 10:48 am by vera
EFF was represented at the Supreme Court of Canada and the British Columbia Court of Appeal by David Wotherspoon of MacPherson Leslie & Tyerman and Daniel Byma of Fasken Martineau DuMoulin. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 2:25 pm by Bridget Crawford
Panelist: David Gurnhan, Southampton Law School Commentator: Jamie Abrams 3. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
I say “sadly,” because there are other institutions putting children at risk, and they get swept away in the loud and persistent denunciations of SOL reform by the Catholic Conference.For this reason, I will examine the strange position Bucks County DA David Heckler has taken with respect to child sex abuse and sex assault victims. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:29 am by Jon Hyman
Here’s a post about the sweetness of revenge, A pro golfer gets his revenge on Twitter; causes a heckler to lose his job, via (our ever-gracious proprietor) Eric Meyer and his Employer Handbook blog. [read post]