Search for: "DAVID I. v. ADES and ANGEL I." Results 21 - 40 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am by Adam Chandler
Orders: Two Grants, Two CVSGs, and Some Notable Denials The Court added two cases to next Term’s docket, granting certiorari in Pacific Operations Offshore, LLP v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
Of particular interest to Episcopalians is the current case in Massachusetts of Gill v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 9:46 am
  The process was slightly revised following last year's botched execution of Angel Diaz. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
On the other hand, say the Los Angeles Times refuses to run an ad promoting the KKK, or promoting Antifa, or opposing vaccination. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 7:10 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Though I can't find the study online, I did find this apparent reference to it in an article from the Los Angeles Times:In a 1995 IAI-approved proficiency test, 22% of the test takers identified the wrong person one or more times. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:44 am by Schachtman
David Schwartz, of Innovative Science Solutions, LLC. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times urges the justices to review Dassey v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am by Alfred Brophy
  What, then, are the books that the judge ordered added? [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 8:55 am
All seven sentences have now been overturned on appeal.In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage writes, "Supreme Court overturns death sentence. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
” For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that “[t]he court’s four liberal justices dissented, warning that new technology has made partisan gerrymandering easier and more precise than ever before. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
  However, I am not affiliated with the firm.] [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, David Rivkin and Lee Casey welcome “Justice Samuel Alito’s lone concurrence” in Gundy v. [read post]