Search for: "DEAL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al" Results 21 - 40 of 234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2010, 4:42 am by Dianne Saxe
BP America Inc., et al., No. 2:10-cv-018660-CJB-SS, U.S. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Litman The decision in Mayo Collaborative Services, DBA Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
At about 11 a.m. on Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
United Staffing Alliance Employee Medical Plan, et al. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:01 am by Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Merrill et al., Nat’l Research Coun- cil of the Nat’l Academies, A Patent System for the 21st Century 122 (2004). [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 10:17 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court in McAllen, Texas, issued a ruling on September 17, 2013, in the case styled, Guerrero Investments LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 2:48 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Homeland Security Investigations and US Attorneys' offices did just that in Operation Mummy's Curse, which involved the case of United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 8:52 am
(IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), section 5 of the United Nations Participation Act of 1945, as amended (22 U.S.C. 287c)(UNPA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code -- and on the President's inherent constitutional powers. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:42 am by Rantanen
Merrill et al., A Patent System for the 21st Century, no. 7, 121 (2004). [2] See id. at 7. [3] U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Because we are lawyers, and we will spend a great deal of time defending the rights of our clients before tribunals set up for that purpose, it is critical to consider the role of courts and their relationship to law. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 pm by Law Lady
Further, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion for jurisdictional discovery.http://j.st/ZfVpCedar Lodge Plantation, L.L.C., et al. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: : Chapter 11 : Murray Metallurgical Coal : Case No. 20-10390 Holdings, LLC, et al., : : Judge Hoffman : Debtors [read post]