Search for: "DIXON III v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2010, 9:58 am by thejaghunter
I would like to thank you for your participation and support of LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick III. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 10:17 am
The Court also noted the NZ Supreme Court decision in R v Dixon [2015] NZSC 147 [see here], holding that digital CCTV footage was both a ‘document’ and ‘property’ under the NZ Crimes Act 1961. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:31 pm
Bickerstaff, 56, is now in jail in Dixon, Illinois on $4 million bond awaiting trial on multiple counts of child molestation involving at least two victims. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:25 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Personal injury lawsuits in the state of Florida must be filed within a certain time frame, known as the statute of limitations. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 6:38 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
In order to hold a property owner liable for a tree injury, the plaintiff must establish the following elements:  i) the defendant had a duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition; ii) the defendant breached this duty by failing to remedy or warn of the hazardous condition; iii) the defendant was aware or should have been aware of the hazardous condition; iv) the plaintiff’s injuries were a direct result of the defendant’s failure to maintain the… [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
Dixon, 10-1540, which the state also claims disregarded various Supreme Court precedents. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:09 am
An excellent finding of broad express preemption where the FDA had specifically determined that a Class III medical device was safe and effective. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
”[6] The court’s stated standard is much less interesting than its reasoning process, which goes 2020. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands has jurisdiction to hear criminal cases arising under the laws of the United States, because its judges do not enjoy the protections of Article III of the Constitution. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands has jurisdiction to hear criminal cases arising under the laws of the United States, because its judges do not enjoy the protections of Article III of the Constitution. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands has jurisdiction to hear criminal cases arising under the laws of the United States, because its judges do not enjoy the protections of Article III of the Constitution. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands has jurisdiction to hear criminal cases arising under the laws of the United States even though its judges do not enjoy Article III protections, because the Court denied cert. in the twice-relisted Sun v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm by Giles Peaker
Kaye v Lees (2023) EWHC 152 (KB) We’ve seen previous instalments in this matter here and here. [read post]