Search for: "DOES I-VII"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
And we'll answer the question: Does the reach of Title VII preclude same-sex sexual harassment where offensive workplace language is not directed at a man because he's a man? [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 4:21 am
Just because the DOJ argues that Title VII does not include LGBTQ discrimination does not mean that you are not free to adopt anti-LGBTQ-discrimination policies in your workplace. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 12:26 pm
What does that mean? [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:16 pm
It does not give them the freedom to discriminate againstany particular religion (a “We will not hire Muslims” policy, for example, remains off limits), but it does allow them to prefer coreligionists, i.e., “individuals of a particular religion. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:41 am
While such behavior may be criminal, it does not violate Title VII. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:24 am
I fully expect an appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:24 am
I fully expect an appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:50 am
Celauro, Senior Counsel at Epstein Becker Green, has a post on the Financial Services Employment Law blog that will be of interest to many of our readers in the hospitality industry: “Seventh Circuit Panel Finds That Title VII Does Not Cover Sexual Orientation Bias. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:42 am
Celauro, Senior Counsel at Epstein Becker Green, has a post on the Financial Services Employment Law blog that will be of interest to many of our readers in the technology industry: “Seventh Circuit Panel Finds That Title VII Does Not Cover Sexual Orientation Bias. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:47 am
Celauro, Senior Counsel at Epstein Becker Green, has a post on the Financial Services Employment Law blog that will be of interest to many of our readers in the retail industry: “Seventh Circuit Panel Finds That Title VII Does Not Cover Sexual Orientation Bias. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:30 am
Does that change anything? [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:22 pm
Does "sex"encompass sexual orientation? [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 6:36 am
I helped write the brief with lead counsel, Gregory Antollino, who argued the appeal. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:32 am
However, Title VII does not prohibit sexual orientation discrimination - at least not expressly.Earlier this year, the EEOC issued a decision concluding that sexual orientation discrimination is a form of sex discrimination and therefore Title VII forbids it. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 8:48 am
Earlier this week in my weekly Employment Case Law Update, I made mentioned of a case out of Connecticut where a district court judge held that being placed on paid administrative leave does not amount to an adverse employment action. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 6:32 am
In this blog post, I discussed a thorny procedural issue: when does a party waive her objection to an untimely post-trial motion? [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:08 am
In defending, Houston Funding argued Title VII does not cover "breast pump discrimination" and moved for summary judgment. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:35 am
Does it go – does it include simply a good friend? [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:37 am
If so, does a legitimate factor other than sex account for the difference? [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:13 pm
Yorktowne Cabinetry, granting summary judgment in a Title VII case.The opinion referenced an earlier decision by Magistrate Judge Urbanski that I missed. [read post]
