Search for: "DORSEY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES"
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2011, 5:40 pm
SIMPSON, Appellant, v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 4:17 pm
However, as he acknowledged at oral argument, his case falls squarely within the ambit of our recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Petitioner’s reply Docket: 08-1498 ; 09-89 Title: Holder, Attorney General v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 7:39 am
United States, ___ U.S. ____, No. 07-1309, 2009 U.S. [read post]
16 May 2009, 3:51 am
EEO/iNews from the United States Supreme Court - Thursday, May 14, 2009Source: iNews © 2009 John D. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 3:27 am
Harold Baer, United States District Judge, Southern District of New York, described in Judge Baer's opinions in Wolters Kluwer Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 7:50 am
This list was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]
