Search for: "David A. Rappaport"
Results 21 - 40
of 94
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2016, 3:34 am
When government uses regulation to retaliate against someone’s politics, relief shouldn’t depend on whether the harassment would have silenced an ordinary citizen [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and Thomas Berry, Cato] More thoughts on the constitutional amendment process [Mike Rappaport, Liberty and Law] To what extent did Antonin Scalia’s thinking on Article V constitutional conventions change over the years? [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 9:05 pm
” [Ed Krayewski] Conservative lawprof Mike Rappaport on DEA’s “absurd,” “ridiculous” refusal to take marijuana off Schedule I [Law and Liberty] Recommended: Scott Greenfield and David Meyer-Lindenberg interview Julie Stewart of Families Against Mandatory Minimums, Cato Institute alum Fault Lines] “Criminal defense bar sides with business lobby in False Claims Act case” [Alison Frankel, Reuters on State Farm case before Supreme… [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
(Randy Barnett and Michael Rappaport) Finally, three of the answers were some form of “yes. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:29 am
But contrary to McGinnis and Rappaport, I think FDR had multiple good reasons for avoiding the amendment route. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:55 pm
So, perhaps unlike some living constitutionalists like David Strauss, I certainly accept the text (and the doctrines I have been describing) as binding law. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:17 am
Clapp*, Ronald Crystal, David A. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 3:34 pm
This point is probably no surprise to careful readers of this blog (see, e.g., these previous posts by Ilya and David). [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:20 pm
Rappaport, David Rosner, Allan H. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:02 pm
Recently Michael Rappaport has tried to make the case that the color-blind Constitution is required by the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment (but not the original meaning Fifth Amendment, ratified in 1791, which, of course, is the basis of the Court's decisions in cases like Bolling and Adarand). [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 2:04 pm
David S Markus (NOT the blogger) represented Casey on the motion. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:24 am
Mike Rappaport has further commentary on the review over at the Originalism Blog. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:00 pm
UPDATE: Bonus from the same (Law and Liberty blog): Mike Rappaport takes on Posner’s claim that the original meaning of “freedom of speech” in the First Amendment did not include symbolic speech like flagburning, citing our own Eugene Volokh. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Bank Deal Rankles Regulators by Liz Rappaport, Devid Enrich and Victoria McGrane in the Wall Street Journal Standard Chartered PLC’s money-laundering clash with a once-obscure New York regulator is shaking up efforts by financial overseers to rein in giant banks around the globe. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Zinnecker The Faculty Lounge Capital M David N. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:00 pm
And last but not least, we have the New York Civil Litigation Review from Aaronson, Rappaport Feinstein & Deutsch. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:44 am
Hat Tip, Mike Rappaport. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:41 pm
” They also comment on critics like David Friedman, Bryan Caplan, Mike Rappaport, and Todd Seavey, who have expressed related concerns. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 1:12 pm
Although it is possible that Mike Rappaport and I were simply talking past one another, as David Bernstein suggested, I am inclined to think there is more going on here. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:51 am
[VICE] “A SOPA Analogy” [David Henderson] DEA agent who mistakenly shot self loses appeal [BLT, earlier] “And people say libertarians lack empathy”: AP adopts pre-emptively disapproving tone toward advances in pain control [Coyote; related, Alkon on Primatene Mist] Cordray, NLRB recess picks allow President to reward key Democratic interest groups [Copland, Examiner] Litigation Lobby gunning for ban on consumer finance arbitration as Cordray priority… [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:07 am
Michael Rappaport makes the originalist case against the President’s recess appointments here. [read post]
