Search for: "David C. Davis, III" Results 21 - 40 of 129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am by David Kopel
Part III explains infection routes for SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2). [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm by MOTP
She provided Smith's date of birth to the receptionist who answered her call, and gave his social security number to David Wright, Esquire ("Wright"), the Moss attorney with whom she spoke. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 9:08 am by Kevin LaCroix
In 108-page August 27, 2015 post-trial opinion (here), Delaware Court of Chancery Vice Chancellor Travis Laster found that and Murdock and C. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Charities that have tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the tax code, as well as political organizations, would still be required to report the names and addresses of donors. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 4:25 pm
He served as assistant chief counsel for the California Department of Transportation from 2007 to 2014, where he was deputy attorney III from 2005 to 2007. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Take Payday Lenders and Arbitration as a Textbook Case: What is the Majority Position on Litigation Waiver and Who Got It Right? [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:07 am by Hollis Kelly
SPECIAL THANKS We appreciate the assistance of Guy David of Gowling WLG with the following discussion of Canadian law, regulation and practice. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 6:14 am
Fund Manager Directive, Earnings management, Engagement, ESG, F&C Management, Fund managers, Hedge funds, Institutional Investors, Management, Mergers & acquisitions, Proxy contests, Shareholder activism, Shareholder voting Is There a First-Drafter Advantage in M&A? [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
To invoke associational standing, FASORP is also required to show that (a) its members would otherwise have standing to sue in their own right; (b) the interests FASORP seeks to protect are germane to the organization’s purpose; and (c) neither the claim asserted nor the relief requested requires the participation of individual members in the lawsuit.These standing requirements pose some significant challenges for FASORP’s case. [read post]