Search for: "David Davies v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 1,090
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am by INFORRM
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors  v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 11:23 am by William Theisen
Two years after Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis [official website] defied the US Supreme Court [official website] ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 11:15 am
However, (1) whatever Davis thinks of the federal judge’s order, she has to comply with it or risk being jailed again, though she is of course free to continue appealing it; and (2) my tentative sense — given Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by David Priess
Constitution says and does not say about secession, differing legal arguments on the topic during and after the Civil War, the government's indecision surrounding the prosecution of former Confederate States of America President Jefferson Davis, the strengths of Davis's primary lawyer Charles O'Conor, O'Conor's strategy for preventing a treason prosecution, how the Supreme Court decision in Texas v. [read post]
Davis became infamous in 2015 for refusing to issue same-sex couples marriage licenses despite the Supreme Court ruling of Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:25 pm by David Kopel
Davis (1937), but NFIB v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
United States and the tax in Moore v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
By Judgment handed down on 29 November 2018 (R (on the Application of Jefferies and Others) v (1) Secretary of State for the Home Department (2) Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport [2018] EWHC 3239 (Admin)) Lord Justice Davis and Mr Justice Ouseley dismissed the Claimants claims for Judicial Review of the Government’s decision to not embark on ‘Part 2’ of the Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 12:28 pm
Five men in total were charged in connection with the armed robbery spree, but only David went to trial: his accomplices all testified against him. [read post]