Search for: "David Luban"
Results 21 - 40
of 236
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
” In an op-ed at The Hill, David Luban argues that “[t]he irony is that filing frivolous accusations with the Supreme Court is itself an ethics violation — and DOJ’s accusations against Jane Doe’s lawyers come perilously close to crossing that line. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:20 am
Speaking of the Boies law firm, David Boies is in a little bit of hot water. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
And as David Luban wrote yesterday on the Just Security, “No defense lawyer could competently represent a client under those circumstances, and incompetent representation is itself unethical. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 8:04 pm
And at "Just Security," David Luban has a post titled "Indefensible: Why Guantanamo defense lawyers can't ethically participate any longer. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
Other scholars, most notably David Luban, accept constraints of legality, but also insist that lawyers’ actions are limited by the norms of ordinary morality. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:19 am
Perhaps the most prescient voice on this side of the debate was that of David Luban, who made the point in Just Security that it is all too easy for our moral footing to slip without our noticing as we become acclimated to new circumstances that would previously have been appalling. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:21 am
The New York Times’s story on “What It Means to Work for Trump,” on top of Jim Comey’s firing last week, got me thinking again about how difficult it is for a lawyer who is a political appointee to act with integrity in the Trump administration. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 3:30 am
Bradley Wendel David Luban and I just finished a paper celebrating the 30th anniversary of the Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:39 am
David J. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:39 am
David J. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:10 pm
Two of my favorite legal ethics scholars -- Brad Wendel and David Luban -- have joined forces to write an accessible history of philosophical legal ethics. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 7:18 am
” My correspondent is referring to this piece I wrote back in June, along with more recent follow-ups after the election, this debate on the subject between David Luban and Daniel Byman, as well as related material on Just Security (see pieces by Luban, Oona Hathaway, and David Kaye). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:27 am
Alter, David Luban, Colleen Murphy, and James G. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
Clara Hendrickson flagged a new episode of the Chess Clock Debates of interest to Lawfare readers, featuring a debate between Daniel Byman and David Luban on whether there is an obligation to serve in a Trump administration. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 7:16 pm
Rodman, Veronika Bílková, Bing Bing Jia, David Luban, and Samuel Moyn. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 11:55 am
Over at Just Security, David Luban, Oona Hathaway, and David Kaye have debated the ethics of working under Trump. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 10:46 am
Clara Hendrickson alerted readers to a new episode of the Chess Clock Debates, featuring Dan Byman and David Luban on whether there is a duty to serve in government under Donald Trump. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 8:16 am
In this episode, Middle East expert Dan Byman and national security legal philosopher David Luban debate whether there is a duty to serve in Trump’s America. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 8:09 am
These include Adil Haque, David Luban, Marko Milanovic, Jonathan Horowitz, Naz Modirzadeh, Kevin Heller, Janina Dill, John Dehn, and Brian Orend. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 12:00 am
Gottleib’s book was also reviewed in the New Yorker and the NYRB.In the NYRB, David Luban reviews Free Speech: Ten Principles for a Connected World by Timothy Garton Ash. [read post]
