Search for: "Davidson v. District Court of Appeal" Results 21 - 40 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2014, 4:55 pm by Patricia Salkin
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County v Board of Zoning Appeals of Nashville & Davidson County, 2014 WL 5147757 (TN App. 10/13/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Signs [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:18 am by Meg Martin
Hughes, Hughes Law Office, Sundance, Wyoming.Facts/Discussion: Elk Horn Ranch, Inc. appealed the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of its petition for review of a decision by the Crook County Board of Commissioners (Board.)The single issue is whether the district court erred in dismissing the petition for review. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:30 am
Employee protected by Title VII if he or she suffers retaliation by the employer after reporting workplace race or gender discriminationCrawford v Metropolitan Government Of Nashville And Davidson County, Tennessee, US Supreme Court, No. 06–1595The genesis of this ruling was an internal investigation into rumors of sexual harassment of employees by the Metro School District Employee Relations Director. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 3:06 pm
Davidson was convicted of a drug offense and a related § 924(c) offense and the district judge fined him $300 on each count. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
Employee protected by Title VII if he or she suffers retaliation by the employer after reporting workplace race or gender discriminationCrawford v Metropolitan Government Of Nashville And Davidson County, Tennessee, US Supreme Court, No. 06-1595, decided January 26, 2009The genesis of this ruling was an internal investigation into rumors of sexual harassment of employees by the Metro School District Employee Relations Director. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 9:07 am by J. Ross Pepper
As well, in a 2012 opinion, the Court of Appeals of Tennessee ruled that the veil of a limited liability company could be pierced in the case of Edmunds v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 6:56 am by Nicole Vinson
Our prior posts detailed this case as it made its way through trial and the First District Court of Appeals. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 11:21 am by Karen Gullo
District Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, EFF and FSFP said the Supreme Court has long recognized that the right to vote is personal and individual. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:58 pm by nflatow
On Sept. 1, the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument of the appeal of the trial court’s ruling in that case finding that DADT unconstitutionally burdened the right of liberty established by our seminal Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
JESUSA ACOSTA, ET AL.; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-13-00110-CV, 406 SW3d 711, 06-26-13) 13-0577 THE FREDERICKSBURG CARE COMPANY, L.P. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 7:08 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(collectively “Lenco”) appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida holding (1) that vari- ous products sold by Lenco infringed a patent owned by Plaintiff-Cross Appellant Bennett Marine, Inc. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
The appeals court says that the district court can revisit the attorneys’ fees and Rule 68 cost-shift on remand. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
HOLLAND, Appellee On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-41959 Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:20 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
P. 3(d)(1) states that the clerk of the district court "must promptly send a copy of the notice of appeal and of the docket entries .,. to the clerk of the court of appeals named in the notice." [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
We AFFIRM the district court's sentence as reasonable. 08a0013p.06 Inre Dewitt McDonald v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:41 am
Moreover, the citation, and even the listed court (District I), was incorrect. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The district court found that this wasn’t so, and the court of appeals agreed. [read post]