Search for: "Davies v. United Fire "
Results 21 - 40
of 264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2010, 2:42 pm
Davis argued on the losing side of Brown v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
Davis, 2018 U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:21 am
Ct. 280; United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:57 am
Davis St. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Davis Download Universal Image Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The Facts in Vance v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 12:58 pm
The appellate court considered Davis to be Vance's co-worker and not a supervisor because it found no evidence showing Davis had the power to hire, fire, demote, promote, transfer, or discipline employees. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
See Davis v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:27 am
The trial court held that the University could not be liable for Davis’ alleged harassment because she did not have authority to “hire, fire, demote, promote, transfer, or discipline” Vance and, therefore, was not a supervisor. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in this Term’s most important case addressing the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, Town of Greece v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
The plaintiffs, whom the court will collectively call `Music Group,’ filed this case against John Doe defendants in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
Stephen Davis, will be seeking investor feedback on a formal recommendation to the SEC as to its potential response to the Citizens United decision. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:10 pm
” Perhaps Davis will provide a vehicle for further fire. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:27 am
Moreover, as provided for in Lamden v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
App. 127, 189 N.W.2d 879 (1971), reversed on other grounds, 389 Mich. 249, 205 N.W.2d 431 (1973); Davis v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:00 am
Perhaps unsurprisingly, a federal court sent his hostile work environment claim under Title VII to trial (Davis v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
Hilton Davis 10/15/1996 3/3/1997 4.63 Markman v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:02 am
Div. 1992) (quoting United Jersey Bank v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
Such a claim could be viable under Title VII and Section 1981 if properly pleaded and proven, the court explained, denying the employer’s motion to dismiss with leave to refile (Davis v. [read post]
