Search for: "Davis v. Little" Results 21 - 40 of 1,099
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Barajas, University of California, Davis Regulators must redress transportation inequities in rural and disadvantaged communities. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 11:36 pm by Mark Keenan
Lara Davies, Director at OLS Solicitors said “The recent case of HD v WB (2023) highlights the importance of making sure clients satisfy themselves as to the level of disclosure provided as well as ensuring they fully understand the content of the agreement (which often involves speaking to an experienced solicitor to discuss the terms and answer any questions they may have) before they sign the agreement. [read post]