Search for: "Dean v. Arena"
Results 21 - 40
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 2:34 pm
LSAT v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
For example, in the 2015 case Harris v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Do South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
In spite of (or perhaps because of) the fact that the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion two weeks ago in the Wisconsin election case, Republican National Committee (RNC) v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm
******************************* Transparency is paramount in the securities class action arena. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
The Court hasn’t had occasion to discuss this in any depth in the conditional spending doctrine or (what should be treated identically) the conditional preemption arena. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Rodgers v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Although marriage is a fundamental right, this is not a case—like Loving or, more recently, Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
So too, in Flowers v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
The first was New York v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
University of Texas and its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 8:53 am
Wade is Garza v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
And, most famously, in Obergefell v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
We also recognize that the line to be drawn in this arena can sometimes be difficult to discern. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The (in)famous Bush v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 9:57 am
A dynamic new dean will come in supporting some innovations. [read post]