Search for: "Deter v. Deter" Results 21 - 40 of 5,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2010, 11:15 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Moreover, it is clear that a private reprimand would not be sufficient to deter [...] [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:01 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Colton Fehr (Simon Fraser University) has posted Deterring Rights Litigation: R v Basque ((2022) 78 Criminal Reports (7th) 138) on SSRN. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:23 am by Matrix LegalĀ Information Team
The measure was similar to the blanket prohibition on persons subject to immigration control marrying without the Secretary of Stateā€™s written permission found to be unlawful in R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:17 am by tracey
Regina (Aguilar Quila and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (AIRE Centre and others intervening) Regina (Bibi and another) v Same (Same intervening) [2011] UKSC 45; [2011] WLR (D) 291 “An immigration rule designed to deter forced marriages, which prevented the granting of leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom as a spouse if either of the parties to the marriage was aged under 21, was an unjustified interference with the right to family… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:23 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The measure was similar to the blanket prohibition on persons subject to immigration control marrying without the Secretary of State’s written permission found to be unlawful in R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 7:42 am by Rick Hasen
Harper, I thought of Leah Litman‘s scholarship on novelty and how Kavanaugh’s proposed rule, if it becomes law, would deter the growth of state constitutional law protecting… Continue reading The post Litman: “Anti-Novelty, the Independent State Legislature Theory in Moore v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 3:12 pm
In the second case on Wednesday, No. 06-939, Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:46 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Last month, the Federal Circuit affirmed decisions from four separate trials in the District of Delaware involving seven different defendants regarding validity and infringement of patents directed to an opioid addiction treatment in Indivior Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 7:14 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
And Tabarrok’s argument is that we’re at the wrong point on the curve.On images of invention, note the post related to Apple v. [read post]