Search for: "Doc, G. & G., Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2017, 6:30 am by Danièle Boutet
Lien à la décision : https://www.canlii.org/fr/ca/cfpi/doc/2017/2017cf806/2017cf806.html? [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:11 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal decides on dosage regime – Swiss-type claims no longer available: G 2/08 – Dosage Regime/Abbot Respiratory (EPLAW) (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (Patent Baristas) EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal rules on patenting a method of treatment by surgery: G1/07 (IPKat) (EPLAW)… [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:11 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal decides on dosage regime – Swiss-type claims no longer available: G 2/08 – Dosage Regime/Abbot Respiratory (EPLAW) (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (Patent Baristas) EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal rules on patenting a method of treatment by surgery: G1/07 (IPKat) (EPLAW)… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:09 am by Marie Louise
A-G’s opinion published – Merck & Co Inc. v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (EPLAW) (The SPC Blog) US: Supreme Court to revisit patentable subject matter eligibility of medical diagnostic methods:  Mayo v Prometheus (Patently-O) (Patent Baristas) (PharmaPatents) (IPBiz) (Patent Law Practice Center) US: Intellectual property problems for personalized medicine (BIOtechNow) US: Supreme Court ruling in Stanford v Roche (IPKat) (IPKat) US: Manager’s… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:51 pm by Gordon Firemark
Halanick Enter., Inc., Case No. 10-2863 (7th Cir., May 10, 2011). [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
Performance Radiator Pacific, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Susan G. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
As set forth in the “Toxic Justice” report, [the plaintiffs’ law firm] paid off what one of the firm’s paralegals described as “whore docs” i.e., doctors who for money eagerly attributed virtually any lung abnormality to asbestos exposure, regardless of what medical evidence actually showed. [read post]