Search for: "Doctor v. Employment Division"
Results 21 - 40
of 359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2010, 5:25 am
Since the doctor's conduct went beyond his "scope of employment," the Appellate Division, First Department, thought St. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: Scott v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Presumably, Lekkas, on the date his employment was terminated, was discharging limited medical duties under the supervision of a licensed doctor. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Presumably, Lekkas, on the date his employment was terminated, was discharging limited medical duties under the supervision of a licensed doctor. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 11:00 am
In the New York case Moll v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 10:33 am
By Little V. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Considering such factors with respect to the Claimant’s relationship with the Authority, the Appellate Division held that the Board's finding that an employer-employee relationship existed between Claimant and the Housing Authority was supported by substantial evidence and declined to disturbed it.The Devore v DiNapoli Decision In Devore v DiNapoli the issue concerned the mirror image of an employer-employee relationship: service provided as an… [read post]
21 May 2015, 6:30 am
The Supreme Court just decided a case called Young v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:32 am
This unpublished opinion from the California Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Two) affirms a trial court order tossing out a $7.5 million punitive damages award in an employment case. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:30 am
Petitioner appealed the Employer's decision but the Appellate Division sustained the Employer's action and dismissed Plaintiff's Article 78 petition on the merits, with costs. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:30 am
Petitioner appealed the Employer's decision but the Appellate Division sustained the Employer's action and dismissed Plaintiff's Article 78 petition on the merits, with costs. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 5:27 pm
In Macciola v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 8:58 am
In a case of first impression, New Jersey’s Appellate Division, in Vincent Hager v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:57 am
Equity Group – Alabama Division d/b/a Keystone Foods v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:11 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 8:49 am
In Ingraham v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:49 am
Few people win under the statute, but this guy did.The case is Blashka v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 7:25 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Bianco v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 9:47 am
We all know about the EEOC, the federal agency that investigates and tries to resolve employment discrimination cases. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:25 am
Regents of UC, Feb. 20, 2015, California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One More Blog Entries: Halvorson v. [read post]
