Search for: "Doe I et al v. Holder et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2016, 7:45 am
Universal Music Corp. et al (Civil 5:07-cv-03783-JF Order and Amended Opinion (9thCir.) [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 9:32 am
Lange et al., Golan v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:05 am
(David Post) For those of you interested in this sort of thing or this issue, I’ve written (along with Annemarie Bridy at U Idaho) a “Law Professors’ Amicus Brief” in the appeal (before the 2d Circuit in NYC) in the Viacom et al. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 8:35 am
(David Post) As I’ve noted before on a number of occasions, a possible landmark copyright case is now before the 2d Circuit, Viacom et al. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 1:26 pm
Kuchta, et al., 2013-0304. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:42 am
A new decision from the United States District Court in Illinois, Miracle-Pond, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 11:13 pm
The Perform Act is intended to “level the playing field among ‘radio-like services’ available via cable, satellite and the Internet (not level to terrestrial radio, I will point out).” (more…) [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm
By Eric Goldman I'm catching up with the YouTube-side briefs in the Viacom v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:35 am
James et al., C.A. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
., et al., Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Capitol County Mutual Fire Insurance Company, et al., No. 08-cv-392, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2009 WL 42603 (W.D. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 5:12 am
It is not a case that draws much attention from higher education circles, but the case of WNET et al. v Aereo has drawn an amicus brief that should worry anyone who is interested in how copyright law serves or inhibits innovation and competition. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
Castaneda et al. ; Henneford v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 8:58 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA et al. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:56 am
Boyar & Miller, P.C. et al., No. 3:06-CV-1936-D (N.D. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 2:26 pm
Seiko, [1984] 1 S.C.R. 583 · Coca-Cola Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
Holder, et al., __ F.3d _ (4th Cir., Feb. 1, 2011). [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:13 pm
Avanci et al.. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 11:16 pm
Let's assume for the sake of the argument that Judge Brinkman was right that "there is no simple alternative solution available to Apple et al. to circumvent EP 131's patented technology in [its] consumer products" because it's a circuitry patent, so you can't just do a quick software update. [read post]
