Search for: "Doe L.L.C. 1-20"
Results 21 - 40
of 185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2020, 5:25 pm
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) issued on April 16, 2020 two orders[1] largely denying requests for rehearing of its prior decisions that, among other things, subjected to minimum offer price thresholds energy resources participating in PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:13 am
In Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:13 am
In Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:16 pm
On August 20, 2018, Noble House’s yacht lost its port-side rudder while entering a channel in the Bahamas. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 10:41 am
Patent No. 9,498,419 (the “’419 patent”) and claims 1, 4, 11–16, 19, 20, and 30 of U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm
., L.L.C. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
Flat River Farms, L.L.C., the Louisiana Second Circuit addressed issues affecting the creation and preservation of mineral servitudes and payment of court costs in a concursus action.[1] In the case, an operator initiated a concursus action seeking to resolve ownership interest in minerals underlying property on which it was operating. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
Flat River Farms, L.L.C., the Louisiana Second Circuit addressed issues affecting the creation and preservation of mineral servitudes and payment of court costs in a concursus action.[1] In the case, an operator initiated a concursus action seeking to resolve ownership interest in minerals underlying property on which it was operating. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
Flat River Farms, L.L.C., the Louisiana Second Circuit addressed issues affecting the creation and preservation of mineral servitudes and payment of court costs in a concursus action.[1] In the case, an operator initiated a concursus action seeking to resolve ownership interest in minerals underlying property on which it was operating. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
Flat River Farms, L.L.C., the Louisiana Second Circuit addressed issues affecting the creation and preservation of mineral servitudes and payment of court costs in a concursus action.[1] In the case, an operator initiated a concursus action seeking to resolve ownership interest in minerals underlying property on which it was operating. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:52 pm
Bracewell, 20 S.W.3d 14, 22 (Tex. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
We have often determined that arbitration was not waived.[1]Footnote 1 in Richmont Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 7:12 am
Sept. 20, 2022). [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm
Owens, 1 S.W.3d 315, 319-20 (Tex. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
Northgate Investors, L.L.C., Slip Opinion No. 2014-Ohio-455 (The Landlord Tenant Act extends to all guests on the premises, regardless of their status as an invitee or licensee. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:03 am
¶ 20. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:37 pm
” Id. at *7 (internal citations omitted).Rule 20“[However, because] Rule 21 does not provide a standard for district courts to apply in deciding whether parties or claims are misjoined … ‘courts have looked to Rule 20 for guidance. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:59 am
’185 patent,col. 19, lines 40–55 (claim 1); see also id., col. 20, lines 3–5(dependent claim 5, similar); id., col. 20, lines 42–62(independent claim 17, similar, but adding restrictionsconcerning precious metals). [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 11:37 am
But remember, this special priority is only available if the UCC-1 is filed by the time the tenant takes possession of the property or within 20 days thereafter. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:28 pm
., L.L.C. v. [read post]
