Search for: "Doe v. Commissioner of Correction" Results 21 - 40 of 874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Commissioner noted that "Petitioners are correct that the Commissioner has opined upon claims of discrimination in prior appeals (e.g., Appeal of D.B., 49 Ed Dept Rep 319, Decision No. 16,041). [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Commissioner noted that "Petitioners are correct that the Commissioner has opined upon claims of discrimination in prior appeals (e.g., Appeal of D.B., 49 Ed Dept Rep 319, Decision No. 16,041). [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 9:17 pm by Josh Wright
But in reading Commissioner Rosch’s separate statement on the new HMGs, I was intrigued by what seems to be a mistake the Commissioner has made repeatedly. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 7:07 am by David Fraser
The Supreme Court has just issued its decision in the case of Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services) v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:07 am by Andrew Wheelhouse, OXHRH
It does not involve the use of intrusive surveillance techniques as in Liberty v GCHQ [2014] UKIPTrib 13_77-H. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:38 am by Jocelyn Hutton
No error of law in the FTT’s decision The Supreme Court held that the FTT decision as upheld by the Upper Tribunal was correct. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:52 pm
The COA decision yesterday in the case of In Joel Silverman, Commissioner of the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 3:14 pm
An interesting and correct decision from the Tennessee Court of Appeals, in Steele v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 3:56 am
The court ruled that in the absence of specific language barring further action, an employer’s failure to act within the time frame contemplated in a collective bargaining agreement does not preclude further action by the employer.The Appellate Division, Second Department, agreed.In affirming the lower court’s ruling, the Appellate Division pointed out that in interpreting similar contractual provisions, the Second Department has repeatedly held that, in the absence of… [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Employer has the burden of proof that a disability prevents the employee from reasonably performing the functions and duties of the positionMatter of New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2008 NY Slip Op 09517, Decided on December 4, 2008, Appellate Division, ThirdNew York State Correction Officer Edward J. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:56 pm by Josh Wright
That is the latest salvo from Commissioner Rosch in discussing Judge Easterbrook’s opinion in Jones v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:38 am by CMS
Does Finance Act 2003, s 75A apply and if so how much should be taxed? [read post]