Search for: "Doe v. Epstein"
Results 21 - 40
of 452
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2023, 5:17 am
The Second Circuit ruled this way in Lundy v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 8:23 am
[1] Suttle v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am
“The fact that the plaintiff subsequently was unhappy with the settlement [she] obtained . . . does not rise to the level of legal malpractice” (Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; Holschauer v Fisher, 5 AD3d 553, 554). [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 11:25 am
It does not attract criminal liability. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 11:17 am
Epstein ed. 1935). [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
In Pelech v Pelech, [1984] CanLII 629 (BC SC), Mrs. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12] Wood v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
That being said, there are serious questions about the FTC’s authority to regulate noncompetes under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, especially following the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
Breaches of Clause 12 are rare; in most instances in which it is invoked, IPSO determines that the content does not engage it. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
Janus v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Lu, Sabastian V. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Lu, Sabastian V. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Epstein, Brian T. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Epstein, Brian T. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 6:05 am
"] From TGP Communications, LLC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:16 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
The debate in many ways goes back to Justice Holmes’s typically cryptic dissenting opinion in Lochner v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:34 am
” The Court Grants Reargument Last March, however, the Epstein case took on new life following a motion to reargue by Epstein who argued that Steinbeck was overruled sub silentio by the Court of Appeals’ 2018 opinion in Congel v Malfitano, a wrongful partnership dissolution case that I wrote about here, in which the Court, quoting from a 1939 Court of Appeals opinion in Lanier v Bowdoin, wrote: The partners of either a general or limited partnership,… [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 12:31 pm
Does the contractor customarily keep the requested information private or closely held? [read post]
