Search for: "Doe v. Preferred Care Inc. et al" Results 21 - 40 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
In one place, the authors indicate “care” is required, and that analysis for random error, confounding, bias “should be conducted”: “Although relative risk is a straightforward concept, care must be taken in interpreting it. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 1:52 pm by Richard Hunt
Lindsay v. 1777 Westwood Limited Partnership, et al.,2018 WL 4006425 (C.D. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 6:33 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Tricam Industries Inc. et al., a South Florida resident filed the personal injury lawsuit in the U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
See also Manual at 614 n. 198., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:51 pm
The memo repeatedly cites Crowley Caribbean Transp., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Lee et al., An Empirical and Consumer Psychology Analysis of Trademark Distinctiveness, 41 Ariz. [read post]