Search for: "Doe v. Wright State University et al" Results 21 - 34 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Bielawski’s employer, the University ofTexas, through an open records request and state courtlitigation. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
Tarter, Ph.D., et al., American Journal of Psychiatry (Dec. 2006), http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/163/12/2134. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
(32-CA-19152-1, et al.; 350 NLRB No. 62) Lindsay, CA Aug. 16, 2007. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
This iterative process continued in countries like India and China, each factory adding its own interpretation and modifications along the way.[17] Wiesner stated, “One thing we’re always so amazed by is the creativity that comes out of the half of the process when producing an object [in a factory]. [read post]