Search for: "Does 1 - 84"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2015, 9:19 am
As of December 1 of this year, Rule 84 is abrogated, and the official appendix of forms is no more. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
This situation indicates that the relationship between A 83 and A 84 is not simple.The present decision, dealing with the revocation of the opposed patent by the Opposition Division (OD), goes along the second path.Claim 1 as granted had the following wording: 1. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:21 am
These criteria also include the complexity of the amendment, whether an amendment to a patent application overcomes the objections raised and whether the amendment, prima facie, does not give rise to new objections (see Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020, Supplementary publication 2, Official Journal EPO 2020, explanatory remarks on Article 13(2) and (1) RPBA 2020).2.3 The appellant argued that with its communication pursuant to Article 15(1) RPBA 2020 the… [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
The present decision suggests that there are special cases where it does not.Claim 1 of the divisional application refused by the Examining Division (ED) read:1. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 4:16 pm
Nor does he seek to patent the content of information resident in a database. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 6:19 am
The law does not allow the State to justify a bodily intrusion on the possibility that a magistrate made a correct inference as to the source of the information in the affidavit. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 2:09 pm
App 84, 90 (2004); see also State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 does not comply with the requirement of clarity pursuant to A 84.[3.11] As the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 is the most narrow and as the wording of the contested feature […] is more precise than in the other requests (for instance, in the main request and in auxiliary requests 1 and 3 “high-speed detection” is not defined via a concrete read-out speed, and the main request… [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
" What does all this have to do with stem cell research in California? [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:05 am
Chiachiere’s request that the Commissioner grant him a certificate of good faith pursuant to Education Law §3811(1).Granting such a certificate would allow the school board to indemnify Dr. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 9:02 am
Dearborn, 2010 WI 84, 2010 Wisc. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 9:34 am
Biogen, Inc., 84 F.4th 1 (1st Cir. 2023), the court considered this question in a case involving a drug study and the FDA approval process. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:56 am
For mods effective 1/1/2011 and later, this new note, just below the experience modifier box in the lower right hand corner of the form, says: LOSS-FREE RATING followed by a number, for example: LOSS-FREE RATING 84% What is this loss-free mod? [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Hence, the reference “(as specified in the description)” is in the present case absolutely necessary (R 43(6)) (Case Law, 6th edition, 2010, II.B.1.1.2 and 1.1.3, e.g. in connection with T 908/04 or T 1156/01) in order to fulfil both requirements under A 84 that the claim must be clear per se and concise, in particular as regards the definition of the “swelling value”. 4.2 Therefore, Claim 1 of the Main Request fulfils the requirements of A 84. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 4:24 am
In the present case, the method claim 1 does not define the meaning of the "transformed per pixel information". [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:25 am
The draft includes $68.3 billion for HHS, defunds the Affordable Care Act and ends HHS' Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality as of October 1. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am
Hamdan, 548 U.S. at 572-84. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 3:10 pm
Frederik Dhondt (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) has published Recent Research in the History of International Law
(Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, Vol. 84, nos. 1-2, pp. 313–334, 2016). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 1:38 am
The Board carefully assessed the applicability of Art. 84 EPC as well as of Rule 42(1)(c) and Rule 48(1)(c) EPC as possible legal basis requiring adaptation of the description, and concluded that such basis does not exist (except possible in the case of non-unity). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:34 am
In the month of November 2010, 84 opinions and orders were issued by the courts. [read post]
