Search for: "Does 1-10, inclusive, in their individual" Results 21 - 40 of 1,283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am by admin
Saying that a tail is a leg does not make it a leg. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 3:25 pm by Robert Chesney
 Under the new version, 10 USC 130f(d) will define an SMO to encompass four scenarios, without respect to the domestic law basis for the operation: (1) A lethal operation or capture operation-- (A) conducted by the armed forces outside a declared theater of active armed conflict; or (B) conducted by a foreign partner in coordination with the armed forces that targets a specific individual or individuals. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 8:03 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  On August 10, FDA requested that DEA increase the APQ and individual manufacturing quotas to address the shortage. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
” In accordance with decision G 2/10, the disclosure of the parent application as filed has to be evaluated in comparison with the subject-matter remaining in the claim after the amendment. [8.4] Claim 1 of the main request is identical to claim 1 as granted. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 11:01 am by oliver randl
Thus, claim 1 does not require the teeth to be adjacent. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:09 pm by Kevin LaCroix
They could require the inclusion of a California choice of law provision. [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Overall, our results suggest that firms’ gender diversity does not seem to correlate with the decision to publicly release its EEO-1 form. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
The discrimination is then reinforced by the very exclusion of the disadvantaged group because the exclusion fosters the belief, both within and outside the group, that the exclusion is the result of “natural” forces, for example, that women “just can’t do the job” (see the Abella Report, pp. 9-10). [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:59 am by Robin E. Shea
Here are your rights as an employer under the ADA, straight from the EEOC's mouth: 1. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:00 am
Maybe, maybe not, said the Board, but it did the trick in In re Scott McKeever, Serial No. 78919885 (September 10, 2008) [not precedential]. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 4:01 am by Administrator
There is no way to download a work, stream a work, or make a work available for on-demand streaming or downloading that does not engage one of the author’s exclusive rights in s. 3(1). [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:48 am by Patricia Hughes
One doctor believes that the term encompasses 10 years. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 12:24 am
An additional benefit is that such conveyancing does not involve the emotional strains of a buyer and seller. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 11:51 am by Geoff Schweller
Since the fiscal year began on October 1, the SEC has awarded almost $170 million to 17 individuals. [read post]