Search for: "Donald Thomas v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 806
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
United States On 11 April 2024, the Colorado Court of Appeals found that Section 230 immunity applied to two retweets from Donald Trump and his son about a Dominion Voting employee that said he was going to make sure Trump would not win the 2020 election, Coomer v Donald J. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:00 pm by Gary J. Simson
 Because there’s no reason to think that Justice Thomas’s recusal in Trump v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by Scott Bomboy
” He also quoted in part a dissent from Justice Clarence Thomas in Trump v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 3:06 am by jonathanturley
For example, Michael Waldman, president of New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice, noted that in 1974 the Court considered United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
The Supreme Court seems poised to reverse Colorado’s decision to exclude Donald Trump from its Republican presidential primary ballot on grounds other than that Trump did not take the right kind of oath to support the Constitution. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman
  This was the point of Justice Thomas’ very first question to Jason Murray, and it was a recurring theme throughout the argument. [read post]
When asked by Congressman Thomas Tiffany (WI-R) about Garland’s guidance not to arrest protesters, Davis testified that he had not received such guidance from Garland and that the only guidance Garland provided was to protect the justices and their families. [read post]