Search for: "Doyle v. Doyle" Results 21 - 40 of 692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2009, 5:56 am
However, a recent trial court ruling gives defendants grounds not only to sustain the Governor's interpretation of Art.I, Sec.25, but to reverse a 1992 precedent [Phillips v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 2:07 am
"Navy v. dolphins: Supreme Court to hear battle over sonar. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:11 am by Nedim Malovic
Previous decisions (both against the Conan Doyle Estate) in Conan Doyle v London Mystery Magazine and Tyburn Productions Ltd v Conan Doyle [1991] Ch. 75 CA have held that the Sherlock Holmes’ name and address and the literary characters themselves are not protectable under UK law. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:33 am
” The Appellate Division dismissed Doyle’s petition.Noting that Doyle asked relief in the nature of mandamus (i.e., an order that a responsible official or agency perform a required duty), the Appellate Division said that mandamus is available only to compel a nondiscretionary governmental act, citing Matter of Altamore v Barrios-Paoli, 90 NY2d 378.Here, said the court, Doyle is demanding that a civil service eligible list be extended. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:01 pm
In his post yesterday on the new Thirteenth Amendment case Matter of Vinluan v. [read post]