Search for: "E. R. Squibb "
Results 21 - 40
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2017, 10:42 pm
” Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 12:48 pm
Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 12:42 pm
Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Moskowitz, Michael E. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 3:28 pm
District Judge Eldon E. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 2011 WL 4708850 (D. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:54 am
District Judge Eldon E. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
We’re doing our duty. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:14 pm
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Inc., 750 F.3d 111, 111 (1st Cir. 2014). [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Gasguzzlers ‘R Us didn’t get its federal bailout and goes bankrupt. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:45 am
See Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 6:23 pm
Data from the first of those trials is expected later in 2013, Bristol-Myers said in an e-mail. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
”); Mark R. [read post]
2 May 2013, 1:34 pm
§ 271(e)(2)(A) alleging infringement of its four patents. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 1:38 pm
The Supreme Court found that the Department of Labor’s position that pharmaceutical sales representatives were “outside salesm[e]n” exempted from the Fair Labor Standards Act was not entitled to the high deference usually afforded to agency interpretations of their own regulations under the Supreme Court precedent in Auer v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:37 pm
Peter Rost e-mailDr. [read post]
