Search for: "E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND CO."
Results 21 - 40
of 162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2019, 11:54 am
See E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 803 F. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:18 am
DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY C-8 PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION, 939 F. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 12:41 pm
DuPont De Nemours did not violate the NLRA by unilaterally implementing changes to its company-wide retiree medical and dental plans based on the unions’ waiver of the right to bargain over such changes. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 7:34 pm
E.I. duPont De Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:29 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:29 am
He received a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from Worcester Polytechnic Institute, a master’s degree in chemistry from the University of Delaware, and a law degree from Georgetown University.He spent 36 years with E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., at the time the world’s largest chemical company. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 1:27 pm
The analysis of whether a likelihood of confusion exists has been enunciated in the 13 part test found in the case seminal case In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973) (the “DuPont Factors”). [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 2:26 pm
To do so, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board looks to a 13-part test set forth in the seminal case In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973) (the “DuPont Factors”). [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:14 am
DuPont de Nemours v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 3:09 pm
In Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases, the plaintiff must establish the presence of a likelihood of confusion between the parties’ trademarks pursuant to the thirteen factors set forth in the case of In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 4:58 pm
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 26 A.3d 162 (Del. 2011), and Riedel v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:44 am
Dupont de Nemours & Co v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
DuPont de Nemours and Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 11:10 am
Du Pont de Nemours, Louisville Works, 346 NLRB No. 113 (2016) and clarified that an employer does not have an affirmative duty to bargain over employment actions that are consistent with its past practice. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 7:36 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:52 pm
The board cited E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 8:23 pm
DuPont de Nemours and Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 10:56 am
DuPont De Nemours & Company, the plaintiffs filed an FLSA collective action seeking compensation for unpaid time spent donning and doffing uniforms and safety gear and performing other activities before and after shifts. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:46 am
In cases where it is alleged that the Applicant’s mark is likely to cause confusion with the Opposer’s mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board will look to the factors for likelihood of confusion set forth in the case In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
