Search for: "E.I. Dupont and Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 186
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2020, 8:33 pm
DuPont De Nemours & Co., 761 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 2000). [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:50 pm
DuPont de Nemours & Co.,878 F.3d 1336, 1345 (Fed. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 11:54 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 748 F.3d 160, 166 (4th Cir. 2014). [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:18 am
E.I Dupont described a willful corporate conspiracy to concealed known hazards of the chemical pollution. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 12:41 pm
See, e.g., Amoco Chemical Co., 328 NLRB 1220 (1990), enf. denied 217 F.3d 869 (D.C. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 7:34 pm
E.I. duPont De Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 10:49 am
DuPont DeNemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973). [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:29 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:29 am
He received a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from Worcester Polytechnic Institute, a master’s degree in chemistry from the University of Delaware, and a law degree from Georgetown University.He spent 36 years with E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., at the time the world’s largest chemical company. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:43 pm
DuPont DeNemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973) (defining the DuPont Factors). [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 1:27 pm
The analysis of whether a likelihood of confusion exists has been enunciated in the 13 part test found in the case seminal case In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973) (the “DuPont Factors”). [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 2:26 pm
To do so, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board looks to a 13-part test set forth in the seminal case In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973) (the “DuPont Factors”). [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 1:49 pm
DuPont DeNemours & Co., our predecessor court articulated thirteen factors to consider when determining likelihood of confusion (“DuPont factors”). [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:14 am
E.I. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 3:09 pm
In Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases, the plaintiff must establish the presence of a likelihood of confusion between the parties’ trademarks pursuant to the thirteen factors set forth in the case of In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 4:58 pm
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 26 A.3d 162 (Del. 2011), and Riedel v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:44 am
Dupont de Nemours & Co v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
DuPont de Nemours and Co. v. [read post]
