Search for: "E.L.1"
Results 21 - 40
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am
E.L., 15-648, was reversed in a unanimous per curiam opinion, which held that the Alabama Supreme Court erred in refusing to grant full faith and credit to a Georgia court’s judgment making a woman the legal parent of the children she had raised with her same-sex partner. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Michigan 14-8106Issue: (1) Whether Miller v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm
E.L., 15-648, meaning that the Supremes are taking a very close look at the case. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
V.L. and E.L. were in a committed relationship, during which E.L. gave birth to three kids. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Federal Trade Commission 15-560Issue: (1) Whether the D.C. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 2:42 pm
For Cook, and many other journalists, biographers, screenwriters, and novelists from E.L. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 9:37 am
LEXIS 694, *1 (Ga. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 8:20 am
CBT New Jersey Appeals Court Reverses Anti-Harassment Order Based on Emails – E.L. v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:56 am
Our concern emanated from the Home Secretary’s attempt to characterise the Bill, which substantially expanded investigatory powers, as merely a re-affirmation of the pre-existing data retention regime.[1] Since that letter was written, it has become apparent that the introduction of the DRIP Bill was not the only time an expansion of surveillance powers was presented in a way seemingly designed to stifle robust democratic consideration. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
The family-friendly tale of young love is based on a series of best-selling novels by British author E.L. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Yet the Keller and Davis decisions erroneously concluded that the use of athletes’ identities in historically-based expressive video games is not constitutionally protected.[1] Davis, slip op. at 4, 16. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 11:50 am
This is a criminal harassment case. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 5:32 am
The little epidemiology that exists on the subject generally has found that all “cases” had exposure to Gd[1]. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:09 am
The acts underlying the harassment charge included: (1) mailing the materials to P, with the intent to alarm or annoy both P and M; and (2) communicating the diary pages via Facebook (with the intent to alarm or annoy M). [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
CBT New Jersey Appeals Court Reverses Anti-Harassment Order Based on Emails – E.L. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am
The court says that the state presented adequate evidence of a “course of conduct”: (1) Moller appeared at K.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:35 am
Childs, 2013 WL 5512846, at *1 (U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:21 am
CBT New Jersey Appeals Court Reverses Anti-Harassment Order Based on Emails – E.L. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
E.L. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:43 pm
Lorsque cette situation se présente, une deuxième demande n’est pas acceptée.Ce cadre constitutionnel a deux applications:1. [read post]
