Search for: "Edward Imwinkelried" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P­­­_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 7:01 am by Schachtman
Imwinkelried, “A Trial Advocacy Postscript to the Daubert Hearing”   [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:12 am by Rob Robinson
Senate - http://bit.ly/Oy1PNm (Eric Johnson) Expert Witness: CEO of CMP.LY Talks Social Media Disclosures - http://bit.ly/LST3HB (Laura Waldman) “Facebook Firing” Claims Under State Law Too - http://bit.ly/LSAyre (Michael Schmidt) Google, Zippers, and Quirky Trademark Law - http://bit.ly/M3kByG (BLLAWG) Growing Recognition of Subjectivity in Expert Testimony - http://bit.ly/OqcERs (Edward Imwinkelried) He… [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:13 am by jpfaff
It seems clear that the evidence about whether it is possible to kill a child solely by shaking him is mixed; Edward Imwinkelried has summarized the competing studies, and several cases in several countries are wrestling with whether SBS is real, or at least reliably diagnosable. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:41 pm by Schachtman
The Third Edition has some notable new chapters on “Forensic Identification Expertise” (Paul Giannelli, Edward Imwinkelried, and Joseph Peterson), on “Neuroscience” (Henry Greely and Anthony Wagner), on “Mental Health Evidence” (Paul Appelbaum), and on “Exposure Science” (Joseph Rodricks). [read post]
5 May 2011, 3:25 pm by Above the Law
I respectfully dissent from Judge Hill’s claim that the video is more about Davis the city than the law school — note the cameo by Professor Edward Imwinkelried, and the shout-out to Professor Carlton Larson (my old college and law school pal). [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:09 am
Edward Imwinkelried says, without qualification, that translators are expert witnesses (The Taxonomy of Testimony Post-Kumho: Refocusing on the Bottomlines of Reliability and Necessity, 30 Cumb. [read post]