Search for: "Edwards v. Cross"
Results 21 - 40
of 637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2014, 10:07 am
Judge Karen V. [read post]
27 May 2014, 10:07 am
Judge Karen V. [read post]
27 May 2014, 10:07 am
Judge Karen V. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 3:47 am
Further, the Supreme Court should have granted dismissal of Edward’s cross claim, counterclaim, and third-party cause of action alleging civil fraud upon the court insofar as asserted against each of the appellants. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
The Court of Appeal today gave judgment in the case of ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 439). [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 11:21 am
Brooks v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 9:02 am
Few would have qualms about cross examining a dishonest Claimant at length, until (hopefully) their web of lies unwinds. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:54 pm
Smith v. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
Professor Edward J. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 12:44 pm
Perhaps the best-known example is the House of Lords decision in R v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
XJA v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 3174 (QB) at [15]. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 6:55 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 5:48 am
Earlier this year, the North Carolina Court of Appeals in Edwards v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:26 am
In this case, Edwards was afforded considerable post-stop judicial review, including the opportunity to cross-examine the officers who arrested him. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
In its 2008 landmark decision Edwards v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:22 pm
If those gateways are not crossed, then the assessment should stop there. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
On January 3, 2015, Edward W. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:51 pm
In the case of Martinez v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 4:14 am
Dino Danelli and Edward Brigati v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 8:27 am
A comprehensive Commentary, edited by Professor Sabine Corneloup and published by Edward Elgar Publishing, was recently released providing an in-depth analysis of the Rome III Regulation implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law governing cross-border divorce and legal separation. [read post]
