Search for: "Edwards v. Federal Bureau of Prisons"
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2019, 2:25 pm
In Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
The most significant of these rulings was the al Odah case, in which a panel that included Judge Garland held early in the line of detainee cases that federal district courts lack habeas corpus jurisdiction over the Guantanamo detainees’ claims. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to Mills… [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm
An order was made committing him to prison for 12 months. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Bureau of Investigation, No. 07-3511 A defendant's conviction for resisting arrest and assaulting federal officers does not necessarily preclude a civil claim based on the arresting officer's use of excessive force during the arrest. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Mills faces up to five years in prison and a $50,000 fine per day of violation when he is sentenced on September 22, 2010. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Mills faces up to five years in prison and a $50,000 fine per day of violation when he is sentenced on September 22, 2010. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Department of Justice found that 5% of 9,691 sex offenders released from prison were re-arrested for new sex crimes within three years (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2003). [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
