Search for: "Edwards v. Internal Revenue Services"
Results 21 - 40
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2020, 9:00 am
Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 9:01 am
The 2018 ruling in Canada Without Poverty v. [read post]
Louisiana Legislature Calls Itself Into Second Extraordinary Session and Includes Certain Tax Issues
30 Sep 2020, 8:46 am
There is no reason for the legislature not to relieve these types of transactions from tax other than the loss of revenue, which may be enough to prevent the legislature from remedying the problem. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 1:05 pm
Edwards v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:48 am
Buzz Photo v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:40 pm
Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
4 May 2020, 9:12 am
The justices also agreed to decide whether a federal law, the Anti-Injunction Act, that bars lawsuits to stop the assessment or collection of taxes also bans challenges to reporting and information-gathering mandates imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, when violations of those mandates carry tax penalties. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
Internal Revenue Service, 19-930. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:43 am
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm
(See Grimshaw v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
Administrator of General Services). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm
It explains how the individual mandate is enforced by the Internal Revenue Service through tax penalties, argues that the Anti-Injunction Act is jurisdictional so that the executive branch’s decision to waive reliance on it was irrelevant, and contends that the Anti-Injunction Act applies because, even though the payments for violating the individual mandate are labeled “penalties” and not “taxes,” some penalties are subject to the… [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and to “clarify that no agency may use presumptions to penalize actions that are authorized by the express terms of that agency’s own regulations. [read post]
