Search for: "English v. Stevens"
Results 21 - 40
of 385
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2023, 3:05 am
Country of origin: new European applications in 2022 v requests for unitary effect On the other hand, proprietors from Asia and the US appear overall less enthusiastic relative to their proportion of European filings. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:41 am
Comment The Court of Appeal noted that it was unfortunate that the trial judge was not referred to Hallen v Brabantia. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
English High Court Rejects Climate Case Against Energy Company Board Posted by Elise Edson, Nick Withers, and Jonathan Swil, Shearman & Sterling LLP, on Friday, July 7, 2023 Tags: Climate change, Commercial litigation, derivative litigation, director duties, English High Court, frameworks Shareholder Proposal No-Action Requests in the 2023 Proxy Season Posted by Marc S. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
English High Court Rejects Climate Case Against Energy Company Board Posted by Elise Edson, Nick Withers, and Jonathan Swil, Shearman & Sterling LLP, on Friday, July 7, 2023 Tags: Climate change, Commercial litigation, derivative litigation, director duties, English High Court, frameworks Shareholder Proposal No-Action Requests in the 2023 Proxy Season Posted by Marc S. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:28 pm
Steven G. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm
Steven Calabresi, at his request. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:40 am
Groff v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 8:15 pm
’” Perez v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:33 pm
There was the first English “right to be forgotten” case and the most high profile case of the year was that brought by Sir Cliff Richard against the BBC. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
Mr Andrew Fulton KC, leading counsel for Mr Soriano, argued that the cardinal principle was that English law regarded it as wrong for a libel defendant to be given the opportunity to scour the books and records of the person he has defamed before particularising a defence [9]. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Stevens, 559 U.S. 460 (2010). 2130. [read post]
Constructive Ambiguity of the Budapest Memorandum at 28: Making Sense of the Controversial Agreement
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
Additionally, Ukrainian and U.S. negotiators Borys Tarasyuk and Steven Pifer recalled that in the discussions about the Budapest Memorandum, U.S. negotiators promised orally that the United States would take a strong interest and respond to any Russian violations of the agreement or the “memorandum’s spirit. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Phelps (2011) Matal v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 2:58 am
Judge Steven Majiedt for a unanimous court held that “the common law doctrine of abuse of process can accommodate the SLAPP suit defence”. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
Janus v. [read post]
