Search for: "Epic Applied Technologies, LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2021, 1:13 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Google LLC v Oracle America Inc. concerned the Java SE program, which uses Oracle's Java programming language. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 1:13 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Google LLC v Oracle America Inc. concerned the Java SE program, which uses Oracle's Java programming language. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
Epic Pharma, LLC, 16-289 (whether the circumstances of invention can help prove non-obviousness) (The Purdue and Grunenthal cases stem from the same Federal Circuit decision but involve separate patents owned by the respective petitioners) Obviousness: MacDermid Printing Solutions, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 5:30 am by Andrew Delaney
For subsurface easements, like water lines, the SCOV decides that the Restatement rule will apply. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/9jDhrh5Fra -> Bell must justify Astral takeover, CRTC says http://t.co/cSpwqtFg6K -> Anton Pillar orders reviewed in XY, LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 10:43 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
’” Greenliant Sys., Inc. v.Xicor LLC, 692 F.3d 1261, 1268 (Fed. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Thus, even though it would be possible to have a registrable llama logo that functioned as a trademark, that’s not what Epic had. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am by Rob Robinson
Follow @InfoGovernance   eDiscovery News Content and Considerations 5 Key Considerations When Litigating Cloud Computing Disputes - bit.ly/w33nPM (Gerry Silver) 2012: The Year Of Technology-Assisted Review In eDiscovery - onforb.es/A5Y2FM (Barry Murphy) Advancing the Technology Assisted Review Discussion - bit.ly/wHaKdD (Mark Michels) Are Lawyers Getting in the Way of Machine-Assisted Review? [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Forbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), (Patent Prospector),Rambus – Rambus stock soars following jury’s dismissal of antitrust and fraud charges from Hynix, Micron, and Nanya… [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am by Kristian Soltes
 Next week, the tech giant must begin implementing a federal court’s injunction from a legal battle with Fortnite maker Epic Games. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am by Kristian Soltes
 Next week, the tech giant must begin implementing a federal court’s injunction from a legal battle with Fortnite maker Epic Games. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 8:47 am by Kristian Soltes
Alibaba’s used-goods marketplace app Xianyu and supermarket app Freshippo have also applied for WeChat Pay integration, the tech blog said. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 8:47 am by Kristian Soltes
Alibaba’s used-goods marketplace app Xianyu and supermarket app Freshippo have also applied for WeChat Pay integration, the tech blog said. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
: A UPSTO green patent fast track update (Green Patent Blog) Concentration of patent cases in the Eastern District of Texas (Patently-O) Surviving patent reexamination (Patents Post-Grant) The more the merrier: The Journal joins the Times in complaining about patents (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC decision in In re Tanaka: Patentee may add narrower claims in reissue, at least for now: (Reexamination Alert) (Orange Book Blog) (Patently-O) (America-Israel Patent Law) (Patents… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent attorney’s… [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
As an initial matter, Cox argued that it should be absolved from liability where its technology is capable of “substantial noninfringing uses. [read post]